TRPML1 Electrophysiology

TRPML1 screening using automated electrophysiology provides a robust and efficient platform for ion channel drug discovery. Sygnature Discovery leverages this approach to support compound profiling, mechanism of action studies and lead optimization.

Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) channels constitute a vital group of integral membrane proteins that are widely distributed in mammalian cells and tissues. These channels play a crucial role in defining cellular signalling and function through regulation of membrane excitability and mediation of intracellular calcium levels. While TRP channels present promising therapeutic opportunities, the identification of compounds devoid of cross-reactivity with closely related family members remains a significant challenge.

TRPML1, a non-selective cation-permeable channel, is predominantly found on the membranes of late endosomes and lysosomes across mammalian cell types. TRPML1 is pivotal in maintaining lysosomal calcium homeostasis, modulating autophagy, and influencing oxidative stress. Mutations in TRPML1 have been implicated in various conditions, including lysosomal storage disorders and neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Correcting aberrant TRPML1 activity has been suggested as a potential strategy to rectify abnormal autophagy and help clear protein/ROS accumulation in affected cells.

Despite some success in modulating TRPML1 with synthetic compounds, the lack of specific pharmacological tools has hampered a deeper understanding of TRPML1’s role in normal lysosomal function and its association with pathological processes.
Sygnature Discovery’s comprehensive TRP channel discovery platform includes meticulously optimized TRP channel cell lines, including TRPML1, TRPML2, and TRPML3, coupled with robust assays designed to support your drug discovery research. Leveraging both 384/1536-well fluorescence-based and electrophysiology platforms for high-throughput screening and lead optimization, Sygnature Discovery enables rapid hit identification and downstream discovery cascades.

HEK cells stably expressing TRMPL1 were produced by Sygnature Discovery. Whole cell patch-clamp experiments were carried out at room temperature using multi-hole chips on the SynchroPatch 384i automated electrophysiology platform. Currents were elicited by using repeated ramps, steadily increasing from -140 mV to + 100 mV over 190 ms, from a holding potential of 0 mV. Data analysis was performed using Data Control 384 V2.3 (Nanion) and GraphPad Prism V10.1.

Figure showing the TRPML1 voltage protocol used in whole‑cell patch‑clamp experiments. The plot displays membrane voltage on the y‑axis and time on the x‑axis. The protocol starts with a vertical step to approximately –100 mV, followed by a diagonal ramp that steadily increases to +100 mV over roughly 190 milliseconds. At the end of the ramp, the voltage briefly holds at the upper value before returning sharply to the baseline. Red shading highlights the initial step portion of the protocol.

Figure 1. TRPML1 Voltage protocol.
TRPML1 currents were elicited by using repeated ramps, steadily increasing from -100 mV to +100 mV over 190 ms, from a holding potential of 0 mV.

To validate the TRPML1 electrophysiology assay, reference agonist ML SA5 was assessed at a range of concentrations using the SyncroPatch384 automated electrophysiology platform. Figure 2A highlights the success rate of the assay, with > 85% of cells successfully completing the experiment and passing strict QC criteria. The superimposed current traces and corresponding time courses shown in Figures 2B and 2C show modulation of TRPML1 activity in the presence of increasing concentrations of ML SA5 (0.01-10 Β΅M). The EC50 of ML SA5 was 0.5 Β΅M which is in line with literature.

Grid-style heatmap showing the quality-control pass rate for a high‑throughput TRPML1 electrophysiology experiment. The panel consists of a densely packed matrix of small squares, mostly green, indicating successful cell recordings, with occasional white squares representing failures. The pattern demonstrates that more than 85% of wells passed QC criteria.
Line graph displaying multiple superimposed whole‑cell current traces recorded during increasing concentrations of ML SA5. The x‑axis represents time and the y‑axis shows current amplitude. Each trace curves upward with increasing activation, with higher concentrations producing progressively larger current responses. The traces overlap in a family of curves, illustrating dose‑dependent activation of TRPML1.
Time‑course plot showing TRPML1 current responses during sequential application of ML SA5 and the blocker GW 405833. The graph contains multiple overlaid traces that begin with stable baseline currents, followed by a rise during ML SA5 application (highlighted by a light-colored shaded region). A subsequent darker shaded region corresponds to addition of the blocker, during which currents decline. The traces illustrate activation followed by inhibition.

Figure 2. TRPML1 high-throughput electrophysiology.
(A) Screenshot from DataControl384 V2.3 (Nanion) showing the high percentage of cells successfully completing the experiment and passing the QC criteria. On average >85% of cells provide usable data. (B) The superimposed current trace showing effect of increasing concentrations of ML SA5. (C) Corresponding time course for the experiment showing activation with increasing concentrations of ML SA5, followed by application of saturating concentration of ML SA5 and then subsequent block by GW 405833.

Sygnature Discovery’s TRPML1 assays have undergone extensive characterization and can be conducted in agonist, antagonist, or dual mode, providing a comprehensive understanding of compound effect and potency. Each assay meets the highest standard of quality control by integrating standard reference compounds, generating robust and reliable data.

Dose–response plot comparing two TRPML1 agonists, MLSA1 and MLSA5. The x‑axis shows log₁₀ agonist concentration (M), and the y‑axis shows normalised TRPML1 current (I/Imax). The MLSA1 curve (blue) increases gradually with concentration, while the MLSA5 curve (pink) shows a steeper rise and achieves higher maximal activation. Both curves display sigmoidal shapes with error bars at each concentration point.
Dose–response plot comparing three TRPML1 antagonists: GW 405833, Lanthanum Chloride, and ML SI3. The x‑axis shows log₁₀ antagonist concentration (M), and the y‑axis shows normalised TRPML1 current (I/Imax). All three curves show decreasing current with increasing antagonist concentration. GW 405833 (blue) shows a moderate decline, Lanthanum Chloride (green) shows a steeper inhibition, and ML SI3 (red) exhibits the strongest and most rapid reduction in current. Error bars are present at each concentration point.

Figure 3. TRPML1 pharmacology.
Concentration response curves comparing two reference agonists (A), ML SA1 and ML SA5 and three reference antagonists (B), GW 405833, Lanthanum Chloride and ML SI3 against the TRPML1 channel. Data is generated using the automated electrophysiology platform.

Fluorescence-based high-throughput screening is the most commonly used route for ion channel hit identification. Sygnature Discovery’s TRPML1 high-throughput screening assay displays excellent correlation with downstream automated electrophysiology assays, ensuring seamless transition from hit identification to lead optimization.

Reference Compound
Platform
EC/IC50 (Β΅M)

ML SA1

Fluorescence

4.8

Electrophysiology

5.6

ML SA5

Fluorescence

0.6

Electrophysiology

0.6

GW405833

Fluorescence

1.3

Electrophysiology

1.9

Figure 4. Platform correlation.
Concentration response curves for reference compounds (A) ML SA1, (B) ML SA5, and (C) GW 405833 generated using fluorescence and automated electrophysiology platforms displaying excellent cross-platform correlation.